Poll: Majority oppose more foreign workers under immigration reform

by Alexander Bolton
08/15/13


page 1 of 2  next »

Opponents of immigration reform are focused on the nation's 7.4 percent unemployment rate as a potential stumbling block for legislation. 

A new poll shows that a large majority of likely voters nationwide do not support an influx of new foreign workers, complicating the prospects of immigration reform in the House.

Opponents of the sweeping immigration reform bill passed by the Senate in June are focused on the nation’s 7.4 percent unemployment rate as a potential stumbling block for the legislation.

A survey commissioned by NumbersUSA, a group opposed to increased immigration rates, shows 44 percent of likely voters want the government to reduce the number of permanent work visas issued. About 10 million new immigrants receive such work permits over the course of a decade under current rates.

Nearly 60 percent of likely voters also oppose the Senate bill’s proposal to increase the number of green cards for new immigrants to 20 million over the next decade, according to the poll. Twenty-eight percent of respondents supported such an increase.

Three-quarters of those surveyed said there are more than enough unemployed Americans with lower levels of education to fill the jobs that would go to millions of new immigrants under the Senate bill. Only 17 percent said foreign workers are needed to fill labor shortages.

Pulse Opinion Research conducted the poll for NumbersUSA by surveying 1,000 likely voters across the nation.

It showed that a solid majority of voters are worried about the impact immigration reform, which could put millions of illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship and create large guest-workers programs, will have on the labor market.

When asked what employers should do if they have trouble finding U.S. citizens to fill various jobs, 71 percent said they should raise pay levels to attract more candidates. Only 10 percent said employers should bring in immigrant workers to keep costs down.

“The public, while having some sympathy for some amnesty under all those very tough conditions, isn’t interested at all in increasing immigration and increasing the level of foreign workers,” said Roy Beck, the executive director of NumbersUSA.

“The business community has put hundreds of millions of dollars into trying to get these immigration increases through because it really goes against the basic thoughts and nature of the American voters,” he added.

Beck argued that many polls to date have glossed over the question of whether U.S. citizens should face increased competition from immigrant workers. Instead, other surveys have emphasized the question of what to do with the estimated 11 million people already living in the country illegally.

While likely voters are somewhat sympathetic to illegal immigrants living in their communities, they are not happy about the prospect of bringing in millions of new foreign workers to compete for jobs.

The Senate immigration debate focused largely on the question of border security. Many Republicans such as Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and Republican Whip John Cornyn (Texas) opposed the bill because it did not guarantee full operational control of the U.S.-Mexico border before granting legal status to millions of illegal immigrants.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), a leading critic of the Senate bill, often raised the issue of its impact on the U.S. labor force but his arguments were ignored by Republicans and Democrats alike.

Beck believes the new data will influence the debate in the House this fall.

“Once you frame the issue as the American worker versus bringing in foreign workers there seems to be no question where the Americans are,” he said.

Beck noted the biggest predictor of how likely voters respond to questions about immigration reform is party affiliation. He said self-identified Republicans have significantly higher levels of opposition to the proposals contained in the Senate-passed bill.

“The Republican voters are far less influenced by their national party leaders and they are definitely...


blog comments powered by Disqus

page 1 of 2  next »


« back to the main page



News
Senate
House
Administration
Campaign
Business
All Capital Living
Congress Blog
Pundits Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room
Hillicon Valley
E2-Wire
Ballot Box
On The Money
HealthWatch
Columnists